TP485: Digital Equity Is Health Equity

Touch Point Podcast
Touch Point Podcast
TP485: Digital Equity Is Health Equity
Loading
/

In 2025, U.S. digital health startups raised $14.2 billion. AI-enabled companies captured 54% of it. The trade press is calling 2026 the year AI moves from scattered pilots to enterprise-scale deployment. Every prediction in every roundup carries one quiet assumption underneath it. The patient on the receiving end can use what’s being built.

The Pew data from January says something different. The income gap on home broadband is 40 points and widening. About one-third of low-income households are smartphone-dependent, on a phone with no broadband, hitting patient portals built desktop-first. 19 million Americans 65 and older have no wireline home internet. 29% of U.S. hospitals offer their patient portal login in English only, even in counties chosen specifically because they have hundreds of thousands of limited-English-proficient residents. The Affordable Connectivity Program expired in June 2024. The Digital Equity Act, $2.75 billion for state digital inclusion programs, was canceled in May 2025.

Two trajectories. One looks like progress in aggregate. The other looks like the patients with the worst health outcomes being structurally locked out of the system that’s being built. Chris Boyer and Reed Smith examine what happens when digital strategy and health equity stop being parallel tracks and become the same problem.

  • Why the 2026 AI investment narrative quietly assumes a digitally capable patient, and what the population data actually shows
  • The smartphone-dependent patient most health systems haven’t internalized, and why portal UX fails them by design
  • Why disparities in patient portal access are widening for low-income, less-educated and 65-plus populations, even as overall use rises
  • What the 2025 cancellation of federal digital equity funding means for health systems whose patient panels actually need the work done
  • Modality mix as the reframe: digital, phone, in-person and printed channels as a portfolio allocated by segment, not a hierarchy everyone migrates toward

The University of Michigan study published in JAMA Network Open in October is the one to anchor on. Researchers looked at 511 hospitals in 51 counties in 17 states where census data showed at least 300,000 LEP residents. 29% of those hospitals offered the patient portal login in English only. 60% offered English plus Spanish. 11% offered three or more languages. In counties specifically chosen because they have hundreds of thousands of patients who don’t speak English at home.

If your most-invested-in digital experience reaches the patients who already had the most options, and barely touches the patients with the worst outcomes, what is your digital strategy actually optimizing for?

Mentions from the Show:

Sponsors